ТЕМА: 1/64 FINAL WJL | JUDGE - ENeRGYSPeeD | RESULTS

Káka vs Tajfun

Káka

1. Technics:

Quite good technics. There are small mistakes. Also there is no clearness and jumps.

2. How do you feel music:

Good. To beat it was not possible.

3. Elements variety and quantity:

Not especially diversly. Has danced a little on time and used a lot of base.

4. Complexity:

The program simple. Has admitted weight of mistakes and has danced not vigorously.

5. Dance performance aggression:

Not aggressive.

6. Basics:

Not bad.

7. The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance:

Anything new - is not present.

8. The total time of dance:

26sec. - easy.

Tajfun

1. Technics:

Quite good technics. Also as well as the contender has mistakes, but not so serious.

2. How do you feel music:

Good. To beat it was not possible.

3. Elements variety and quantity:

A quite good variety. Better, than at the contender.

4. Complexity:

THas danced neatly and vigorously. The program is more complex, than at the contender.

5. Dance performance aggression:

Nice energetic.

6. Basics:

Nice.

7. The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance:

Interesting elements. New - is not present.

8. The total time of dance:

25sec. - easy.

Next Stage - Tajfun

Technics - Tajfun win; How do you feel music - "="; Elements variety and quantity - Tajfun win; Dance performance aggression - Tajfun win; Basics - "="; The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance - "="; The total time of dance - Káka win.

Toxik vs Bagi

Toxik

1. Technics:

Excellent technics. Has danced neatly without mistakes.

2. How do you feel music:

Good. To beat it was not possible.

3. Elements variety and quantity:

A good variety. Excellent tricks. Recurrences of elements - are not present.

4. Complexity:

Complex enough program. To dance aggressive and without a uniform mistake is huge plus.

5. Dance performance aggression:

Has danced aggressive.

6. Basics:

Good.

7. The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance:

Interesting elements. New - is not present.

8. The total time of dance:

25sec. - easy.

Bagi

1. Technics:

Quite good technics. Mistakes are not present.

2. How do you feel music:

Good. To beat it was not possible.

3. Elements variety and quantity:

Not diversly. Used a lot of base.

4. Complexity:

The program simple. Has danced easily, but without mistakes.

5. Dance performance aggression:

Not so energetic.

6. Basics:

Not bad.

7. The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance:

New - is not present.

8. The total time of dance:

25sec. - easy.

Next Stage - Toxik

Technics - Toxik win; How do you feel music - "="; Elements variety and quantity - Toxik win; Dance performance aggression - Toxik win; Basics - Toxik win; The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance - Toxik win; The total time of dance - "=".

Fizas vs. WILL

Fizas

1. Technics:

Good technics. All elements neatly are used. Base not precise. In the rest claims are not present.

2. How do you feel music:

Good. To beat it was not possible.

3. Elements variety and quantity:

A quite good variety. Good tricks.

4. Complexity:

Here complexity consists in clearness and aggression. It is present. Complexity of the program on an average level.

5. Dance performance aggression:

Quite good aggression.

6. Basics:

Not bad.

7. The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance:

Interesting elements. New - is not present.

8. The total time of dance:

24sec. - easy.

WILL

1. Technics:

Technics on an average level. Has danced not vigorously. From for not vigorous dance, clearness of elements is lost. Also a problem with hands.

2. How do you feel music:

Good. To beat it was not possible.

3. Elements variety and quantity:

Quite diversly.

4. Complexity:

During all time danced sadly. Therefore Low complexity of the program.

5. Dance performance aggression:

Bad.

6. Basics:

Not bad.

7. The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance:

New - is not present.

8. The total time of dance:

39sec. - normal.

Next Stage - Fizas

Technics - Fizas win; How do you feel music - "="; Elements variety and quantity - Fizas win; Dance performance aggression - Fizas win; Basics - "="; The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance - Fizas win; The total time of dance - WILL win.

3RUNNER vs. PiLkIzZ

3RUNNER

1. Technics:

Excellent technics. All elements are executed vigorously and neatly. Gross errors are not present.

2. How do you feel music:

Good. To beat it was not possible.

3. Elements variety and quantity:

A good variety. An excellent set tricks.

4. Complexity:

The program complex enough.

5. Dance performance aggression:

Good energy.

6. Basics:

Good.

7. The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance:

Interesting elements. New - is not present.

8. The total time of dance:

46sec. - good.

PiLkIzZ

1. Technics:

Quite good technics. Many gross errors are noticed. Also there is no clearness and jumps in some instants.

2. How do you feel music:

Good. To beat it was not possible.

3. Elements variety and quantity:

Good enough, but there are recurrences.

4. Complexity:

Anything complex is not present. Has admitted weight of gross errors.

5. Dance performance aggression:

Not so energetic.

6. Basics:

Not bad.

7. The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance:

Good elements. New - is not present.

8. The total time of dance:

42sec. - normal.

Next Stage - 3RUNNER

Technics - 3RUNNER win; How do you feel music - "="; Elements variety and quantity - 3RUNNER win; Dance performance aggression - 3RUNNER win; Basics - 3RUNNER win; The presence of the new interesting elements or Your own connections in dance - 3RUNNER win; The total time of dance - 3RUNNER win.

Scot vs. FunnyJumpstyler

Участник Scot дисквалифицирован по двум причинам:

Next Stage - FunnyJumpstyler

N E X T S T A G E (1/32 F I N A L) -

Toxik

Fizas

3RUNNER

Dudq

FlyHigh

Scot

Sampi

Kram

Tajfun

Cost

Scot vs. FunnyJumpStyler

Оба участника из России, поэтому результаты пишу только на русском!

Scot

1. Техничность исполнения элементов и связок в танце:

Техника на превосходном уровне. Танец исполнен четко и энергично. Малейшая ошибка в конце видео.

2. Чувство музыки в выбранном Вами или данном организаторами:

Попадание в бит присутствует. Обыгрыша нет.

3. Разнообразность и количество элементов, задействованных в танце:

Разнообразно. Отличные трюки, красивые связки и закрутки (с захватом).

4. Сложность программы:

В принципе сложная. Маленькая неувязочка - во времени танца. Довольно сложные элементы, а главное энергично и четко исполнены, что я уже писал в критерии "Техника".

5. Агрессивность танца:

Агрессия присутствует в некоторых моментах, но сам танец можно назвать энергичным.

6. Техничность исполнения базы:

Базу не использовал.

7. Наличие новых интересных элементов или придуманных Вами связок:

Интересные элементы и связки присутствуют. Для себя нового не увидел.

8. Общее время танца:

20 секунд - низкое время.

FunnyJumpstyler

1. Техничность исполнения элементов и связок в танце:

Неплохая техника. Имеются маленькие ошибки.

2. Чувство музыки в выбранном Вами или данном организаторами:

Попадание в бит присутствует. Обыгрыш есть, но он банален и повторяется.

3. Разнообразность и количество элементов, задействованных в танце:

Не разнообразно. Также, как и во втором критерии имеются повторения.

4. Сложность программы:

Программа несложная. Танцевал не энергично и не хватало прыгучести. В принципе на видео все понятно.

5. Агрессивность танца:

Не агрессивно.

6. Техничность исполнения базы:

Использовалась одна HardJump база. База не агрессивная, узкая, без прижимов и задней перепрыжки.

7. Наличие новых интересных элементов или придуманных Вами связок:

Отсутствует.

8. Общее время танца:

25 секунд - низкое время.

Next Stage - Scot

В технике имеет большое преимущество участник Scot. Попадание в бит на обыгрыше выигрывает участник FunnyJumpstyler. В разнообразие выигрывает участник Scot. В сложности программы также имеет большое преимущество участник Scot. Агрессивность танца - побеждает Scot. В технике базы побеждает участник FunnyJumpstyler, т.к. участник Scot не использовал базу в своем танце. В седьмом критерии побеждает участник Scot. В общем времени танца побеждает участник FunnyJumpstyler.

Участник Scot предупреждается в нарушении правил, в котором написано, что "интро" видео не должно длится больше по времени, чем сам танец.