ТЕМА: Skepticzz PAIRS 1/32 FINAL

3. Chip and Vanito
8. Vedr and RaiderMusic
14. MAILS and Riko
11. SpaRRow and Weiwior
19. Jagr and Vision

Second stage (1/32): 16-29 of June (uploading files on rapidshare, youtube and e.t.c.)
Judging: 29 june- 6 july of june
Next Stage Toss-up: 7-8 of July

MUSIC: YOUR CHOICE(ONLY HARDSTYLE MUSIC)
One solo!
Offical Logo: www66.zippyshare.com/v/78160505/file.html

RULES(EN): jumpstylers.ru/forum/wjl-2014-rules.html
RULES(RU): jumpstylers.ru/forum/wjl-2014-pravila.html

vedr vs raidermusic

wiewior vs sparrow

Chip vs Vanito

Chip vs Vanito

Chip

1.Technique of dance. - 4/5
2.Complexity and variety of the dance. - 3.25/5
3.Aggression and Energy of dance. - 4.5/5
4.Feeling music, rhythm, dance on beat. - 4/5

Total - 15.75/20

Really nice Belir influenced style man!
For me, your aggression and your technique are really awesome, but I have seen better from you in previous rounds. Your dance in beat with the music was perfect until around 0:30 where I feel that you lost the beat of the music a little. Your tricks however were a little bit simple compared to previous rounds too! However for me, this is an incredible dance!

Vanito

1.Technique of dance. - 3.75/5
2.Complexity and variety of the dance. - 4.5/5
3.Aggression and Energy of dance. - 4/5
4.Feeling music, rhythm, dance on beat. - 3/5

Total - 15.25/20

First thing to say, you deleted my comment when I wrote a positive comment? wow..
Now, in this video I see a lot of tricks which is really nice but for me, you competely lost the beat of the music at 0:23 onwards.. after that point, most of the dance was offbeat which is slightly disappointing. Your technique and flow of your dance were not bad, some tricks could have been executed a little better to keep the flow of your dance going ( for example, the trick at 0:23 and 0:32, the flow was a little sloppy at these points). Your aggression was good in my opinion but it's still something you could improve on. Overall, not a bad video from you, it was actually nice to watch but for me your beat of the music to your dance is where the fault lies.

Winner - Chip

RaiderMusic vs Vedr

RaiderMusic

1.Technique of dance. - 3.75/5
2.Complexity and variety of the dance. - 3.5/5
3.Aggression and Energy of dance. - 4.5/5
4.Feeling music, rhythm, dance on beat. - 3.5/5

Total - 15.25/20

Old solo, is there any point in this comment when I know that you've improved since then?
Anyway, dance was too fast for the music for starters. Really nice high kicks and height in your basis at the beginning. Tricks weren't too complex but weren't too simple either so, more or less average really.
GG

Vedr

1.Technique of dance. - 3.5/5
2.Complexity and variety of the dance. - 3.75/5
3.Aggression and Energy of dance. - 4/5
4.Feeling music, rhythm, dance on beat. - 3.5/5

Total - 14.75/20

I know you can do much better than this man, lately you were beginning to impress me in DFM! You are onbeat at the start of your solo but at 0:24, I feel like there is a loss in the beat of the music completely. Good kicks and good height but again there's still room for improvement there! Your tricks were nice but the flow of them seemed a little sloppy at times too.. Really nice spin though, I was impressed! For me your technique would have been much higher in points if your tricks were executed perfectly man!

Winner - RaiderMusic

Mails vs RIKO

Mails

1.Technique of dance. - 4.25/5
2.Complexity and variety of the dance. - 4/5
3.Aggression and Energy of dance. - 4.5/5
4.Feeling music, rhythm, dance on beat. - 4/5

Total - 16.75/20

Not a bad solo man! I have seen better from you if you compare this solo to some previous ones, but for me this solo is pretty good! I would have given you a little bit higher score in Technique if you finished your ending perfectly! Remember to keep in time with the music when executing tricks, a little offbeat on some, but nothing too bad!

RIKO

No Movie

Winner - Mails

Sparrow vs Wiewior

Sparrow

1.Technique of dance. - 3.75/5
2.Complexity and variety of the dance. - 4.75/5
3.Aggression and Energy of dance. - 4.75/5
4.Feeling music, rhythm, dance on beat. - 3/5

Total - 16.25/20

Strange, but good video..
So many nice tricks and combos, and very good aggression but for me, there is very little musical feeling in this dance.. You start on time, you end on time, and you come out of the spin on time, but your tricks and kicks in connection to the beat of the music during your solo don't match. About your technique, it's nice yes, you can execute tricks, yes, but you forget to make it look clean, that's what ruins it for me. If it was clean technique then for sure you would pass.

Wiewior

1.Technique of dance. - 5/5
2.Complexity and variety of the dance. - 3.75/5
3.Aggression and Energy of dance. - 4.25/5
4.Feeling music, rhythm, dance on beat. - 4.25/5

Total - 17.25/20

I think what people forget about technique is the fact that you need good flow to match that technique, for me, this is perfect! Some higher kicks would compliment this (on some tricks there was low kicks, but nothing bad). The only thing I would say that's bad is the tricks.. simple combos, but really effective ones too! For me, you deserve this pass.

Winner - Wiewior

Vision vs Jagr (Most epic battle of this round)

Vision

1.Technique of dance. - 4.75/5
2.Complexity and variety of the dance. - 4.25/5
3.Aggression and Energy of dance. - 4.5/5
4.Feeling music, rhythm, dance on beat. - 3.75/5

Total - 17.25/20

Prime example of a jumper that knows ''technique''. This dance is really clean but my only problem with it that I seen was at 0:20 when your foot slides on the ground, I don't know if it's intentional or not, but that's the only thing about your technique that could have looked any better. In terms of beat, some of your combos didn't match the beat at all, then others did. Your combos are nice, but again could be a little more complexed in future. Your aggression and energy is incredible for someone who has an ''injury'' but it's very clear in your basis at 0:31 you have this injury because your energy could have been so much better in this basis! Overall, great video man!

Jagr

1.Technique of dance. - 4.5/5
2.Complexity and variety of the dance. - 3.75/5
3.Aggression and Energy of dance. - 5/5
4.Feeling music, rhythm, dance on beat. - 3.75/5

Total - 17/20

Your style is so clean in this round and so powerful! My problem with your technique is your ending.. if you had excuted your ending perfectly then for me it would be a straight 5/5. Aggression was perfect in my opinion. Your tricks are great but for me a little bit simple compared to anything you've done previously.. At 0:27 and 0:34 you performed the same trick too. My biggest problem for me was the beat of the music, I actually had to download this video to slow it down just to make sure about your beat. For me, some of your solo is onbeat (for example, your basis at 0:29 is onbeat, and your start of your solo 0:17- 0:20 was also onbeat) but then some of your tricks go out of time with the music. I did mention in the previous round to you that onbeat is an improtant criteria, and yes, it improved a lot, but I think if you had made this solo 100% onbeat, you would have passed without a doubt!

Winner - Vision

For me, this is the hardest battle I've ever had to judge, and I think both jumpers should be proud of the videos that they have made. Both jumpers are perfect examples of great dancers of the Russian/Polish communities. For me, this battle should have been towards the 1/2 final or final, not as early as the 1/32 finals..

Rhythm 3/5? If 23 seconds you have not understood my trick, it does not mean that I got lost out there, I never lost, because dancing solely my tricks. Watch in slow motion and all will see. Everything else I agree, but the rhythm 3/5 this is nonsense.

Thanks for you )
Thanks for battle Xardas!)
Good Luck in 1/16)

Xardas !!! Браво . Ягр сильный соперник , но ты оказался по мощнее в этот раз , удачи .

VaNiTo пишет:
You're right, 1/5 sounds more accurate. But on a serious note, I think you missed what I'm trying to say. Most tricks after 0:23 are offbeat.